"If someone buys the Sistine Chapel, does he
have the authority to destroy it?". Diego Rivera, 1934
In May, 1933, as Americans were beginning to recover from the
Great Depression and the extreme poverty brought on by the Dust
Bowl, the Rockefeller family commissioned Mexican muralist,
Diego Rivera, to paint an enormous fresco for the lobby of the
RCA building at 30 Rock in Rockefeller Center. It was to be
entitled: “Man at the Crossroads”, a 15 X 37-foot painting that
was to depict “the social, political, industrial, and scientific
possibilities of the twentieth century”. To see the entire
mural, go to
https://upload.wikimedia.org/.../Libro_Los_Viejos_Abuelos...
The central panel depicted a machine operator – a laborer – with
an expression on his face that projected uncertainty and even
skepticism that the machine could be operated at all. He was
flanked by two other panels to be known as, “The Frontier of
Ethical Evolution” and “The Frontier of Material Development”,
which respectively represented socialism and capitalism. The
Roosevelt family approved of this theme in spite of the fact
that they had created the corporate imperium that was American
domestic and international business. Their fortune began with
the establishment of Standard Oil, one of the predecessors of
Exxon and Mobil Oil. The Rockefellers drew up a 3-page contract
with Rivera in 1933, commissioning what they thought would be an
important piece of art that would cause people to think deeply
about the future of the 20th Century.
Rivera, began his fresco in May of 1933 in accordance with his
3-page contract with the Roosevelt family, but as the piece
progressed and criticism began to mount, Rivera decided to
insert his own political views into the painting. Rivera was a
Marxist, as was his wife, Frida Kahlo, and as were many of his
fellow artists in the Muralist Movement.
In the early iteration of the fresco, Rivera placed a laborer
operating an enormous machine at the center, and on either side
of the fresco he depicted the crossroads of the political
ideologies dominating that period in history: capitalism (to the
figure’s right) and communism (to the figure’s left). Why Nelson
Rockefeller, the scion of one of the wealthiest and most
powerful dynasties in the world - the family that built Standard
Oil - would think that Rivera would paint anything other than he
did is an interesting question. When Nelson Rockefeller saw that
Rivera had painted the image of Vladimir Lenin on the left
panel, Rockefeller, a lion of laissez-faire capitalism, was
deeply offended and offered Rivera the option of simply removing
the image of Lenin. Rivera refused, saying that he paints what
he sees. In response, Nelson Rockefeller cancelled the project,
paid Rivera in full, and directed employees to chip off the
fresco entirely.
Fortunately, Rivera had photographed the mural as he painted,
and with these photos, he was able to recreate the entire
painting that now is housed in the Museo del Palacio de Bellas
Artes in Mexico. He renamed the piece, “Man, Controller of the
Universe”.
Rivera’s apostasy was much more than merely including a portrait
of Vladimir Lenin on the “The Frontier of Ethical Evolution”
panel. On the panel entitled “The Frontier of Material
Development”, Rivera depicted the louche and debauched life of
the wealthy - mired in corruption, monopolies, exploitation of
labor, and the laissez-faire capitalism that was characteristic
of the Gilded Era. And in this side, Rivera included a portrait
of Nelson Rockefeller, himself. So, while Rockefeller envisioned
a paean to modernity, where capitalism would join with socialism
for a better future for mankind, what he got was Diego Rivera
and his vision of the actual class divisions that tore apart the
fabric of society – a vision where unregulated capitalism had,
in fact, immiserated the working class.
“Man, Controller of the Universe” is a magnificent attempt to
capture the angst felt by the majority of people due to the
dramatic changes delivered to a society that was ill-equipped to
find their place within it. Unregulated capitalism had
transformed societies before societies could adapt to the power
of the technological, financial, and cultural changes that had
been introduced to it – to the massive scientific and
technological advances that affect everyday life. Diego Rivera
asked the question: can we manage this new world? His fresco was
an expression of the times in which it was painted, but it is
also a reflection of the times in which we now live.
And we’re still very much at Rockefeller’s “Crossroads”. What
will technology bring us? What will a world where everybody can
be educated bring us? While the power that technology and the
fruits of capitalism have unceremoniously delivered the world
endless power to transform, it is how we wield this power that
will determine our future.
Art is history, an expression of its moment. And Diego Rivera’s
fresco was, indeed, that. The “World Telegram” newspaper ran
this headline following the display of the fresco in 1933:
"Rivera Paints Scenes of Communist Activity and John D. Jr.
Foots the Bill." The theme of Rockefeller Center was “New
Frontiers”. Susana Pliego Quijano, co-author of “Man at the
Crossroads: Diego Rivera’s Mural at Rockefeller Center”,
wondered: “What made the Rockefellers think that Rivera’s vision
would be the same as theirs?
And the debates we are having today, notwithstanding the nightly
clown show that is the Republican Party, are still the subject
of Rivera’s fresco. Can we manage this New Frontier? Can the
American Imperium withstand its worst instincts, its history of
slavery, its history of its Native American genocide? Will we
fall backward to the original sins of our Founding Fathers? And
most importantly, who gets to choose? |