We Want Them Infected
 
For Trump, those who die from the coronavirus are “superfluous people”, or in his mob style vernacular: they are nothing but “losers”.
 
By Debby Long
 
“Totalitarianism strives not toward despotic rule over men, but toward a system in which men are superfluous” - Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951

I’ve wondered why, of all the political advantages that could have redounded to the benefit of Donald Trump had he decided to fight the coronavirus, he chose, instead, to let ‘er rip. Rip though red states and blue states; rip through his cult of deadheads at his demented rallies, and through his own Republican party – to let ‘er rip like there was no tomorrow. How does that make sense for any politician, and particularly one who needed those deadheads and those zombie Republicans in order to win a second term in office? Why, in fact, did he choose to delay stimulus checks for desperate Americans in red states and blue states? He could have literally snatched victory from the jaws of defeat in the November election had he done so. Instead, he chose what was natural for him; he chose “Homo homini lupus” - a man is a wolf to another man. It was as if Donald Trump were the arsonist dictator, setting America on fire just to watch it burn to the ground.

Maybe he sees the victims of this pandemic as, what political theorist, Hannah Arendt, described as “superfluous people”. Then it does, indeed, begin to make sense. In Arendt’s, 1951 publication: “The Origins of Totalitarianism” she writes:

“Totalitarian government always transformed classes into masses, supplanted the party system, not by one-party dictatorships, but by a mass movement, shifted the center of power from the army to the police, and established a foreign policy openly directed toward world domination”. -chapter 13, page 461.

(https://urpdfs.com/the-origins-of-totalitarianism-pdf/)

For Trump, those who die from the coronavirus are “superfluous people”, or in his mob style vernacular: they are nothing but “losers”. But now as he slinks off to Mar-a-Largo after losing the election, his trademark scowl won’t be because Republican ideology has been repudiated; it is because his personal worldview has been demolished. He is a totalitarian loser. His fictitious family coat-of-arms bears the phrase: “Numquam Concedere” (Never Concede), but his actions trumpet: “Anus Protectus”. Instead of world domination, Trump is reduced to kicking sand in the faces of his club members at Mar-a-Largo and pardoning his RICO buddies along with his entire nuclear family.

But while Donald Trump will likely be remembered, at best, as a totalitarian wannabe, what will the Republican Party be remembered as? It appears that the clammy Tom Cotton has his hopes linked to Donald Trump’s zero-sum ideology, and certainly the smarmy Ted Cruz continues to ooze those very same aspirations. One asks: “Where do these guys come from”?

These men are not anomalies. They are Republicans through and through. While we observe the environmental consequences of Republican deregulation of industrialized farming techniques, (https://kissthegroundmovie.com/), and the natural state of affairs when government becomes small enough to be “drowned in a bathtub” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast, what we are seeing is a garbled, but predictable extension of Neoliberalism. And Donald Trump is the hood ornament of modern Republicanism. He is the Ubu Roi (King of Turds) of Alfred Jarry’s 1896 play. And Mitch McConnell, Ted Cruz, and Tom Cotton are the promulgators of Jarry’s “science of imaginary solutions”.

As Hannah Arendt wrote in 1951:

“The totalitarian attempt to make men superfluous reflects the experience of modern masses of their superfluity on an overcrowded earth. The world of the dying, in which men are taught they are superfluous through a way of life in which punishment is meted out without connection with crime, in which exploitation is practiced without profit, and where work is performed without product, is a place where senselessness is daily produced anew. Yet, within the framework of the totalitarian ideology, nothing could be more sensible and logical; if the inmates are vermin, it is logical that they should be killed by poison gas; if they are degenerate, they should not be allowed to contaminate the population; if they have “slave-like souls” (Himmler), no one should waste his time trying to re-educate them.” - chapter 12, page 457.

Do American families really like the two and three jobs they have to work just to barely maintain the middle-class life their parents enjoyed in the 1960s and 70s with only one job? What if the Neoliberalism that has guided Republican thought for decades succeeds in making us a “superfluity on an overcrowded earth”? What if the Republicans retain the Senate or wipe out Democratic wins entirely in the 2022 midterms? Will we just have to get used to the irrelevant government they have sought for decades to sculpt from American democracy?

We Americans are exhausted as we run as fast as we can in order to just stay in the same place we were in 1970. But we never knew how expendable we were until Donald Trump became our president.

image: Masao Tsuruoka’s “Heavy Hand”, 1949
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
    Copyright 1997 - 2024 lairdslair.com All Rights Reserved Contact Webmaster
    Online 28 Years This site uses javascript